Winner and loser in CRA pandemic benefit crackdown

Article content material

We don’t know with certainty when COVID-19 was first detected in people, however not less than one scientific examine suggests a probable timing of the primary case was detected in China on Nov. 17, 2019. 4 years later, COVID-19 continues to be with us, however the related pandemic-related authorities advantages are lengthy gone.

But practically every week, our federal courtroom system continues to work its means via greater than 1,000 COVID-19 benefit cases which are at present beneath overview by the Canada Revenue Agency.

Article content material

Article content material

Two current instances, determined earlier in November, give us a glimpse into the sorts of claims being reviewed, and rejected, by the CRA. The instances concerned the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and its alternative, the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB).

As a reminder, CERB was provided for any four-week interval between March 15, 2020, and Oct. 3, 2020. To be eligible for CERB advantages, an applicant needed to reveal they’d earnings of not less than $5,000 from (self-)employment earnings in 2019 or within the 12 months previous their first utility.

CERB was changed by CRB, which turned obtainable for any two-week interval between Sept. 27, 2020, and Oct. 23, 2021, for eligible staff and self-employed staff who suffered a lack of earnings because of the pandemic. CRB’s eligibility standards have been just like CERB in that they required, amongst different issues, that the person had earned not less than $5,000 in (self-)employment earnings in 2019, 2020 or in the course of the 12 months previous the date of their utility.

CERB and CRB advantages are mostly chosen for overview by the CRA when it’s unclear if the taxpayer earned not less than $5,000 of earnings in a previous qualifying interval. Every of the 2 current instances concerned taxpayers requested to show they earned sufficient earnings.

Article content material

Article content material

The primary case concerned a Quebec taxpayer who utilized for and obtained CERB for seven four-week durations (March 15, 2020, to Sept. 26, 2020), and subsequently utilized for and obtained CRB for 27 two-week durations (from Sept. 27, 2020, to Oct. 9, 2021).

On Jan. 20, 2022, the CRA chosen the taxpayer’s file for an preliminary overview to find out whether or not he had met the eligibility standards for CERB and CRB. The taxpayer defined to the CRA agent that he owned his personal firm and that he paid himself in dividends as a self-employed employee. The taxpayer produced a T5 funding earnings slip for the 2020 taxation yr displaying dividend earnings of $7,479.60, which was filed on March 31, 2021.

Ordinarily, we consider dividend earnings as funding earnings, being the return on an funding in shares, however on the subject of COVID-19 advantages, the CRA has accepted that non-eligible dividends (usually these paid out of company earnings taxed on the small enterprise fee) rely in the direction of the minimal $5,000 in earnings required for eligibility. That’s as a result of enterprise homeowners have flexibility in how they are remunerated: salary or dividends.

Article content material

On this case, nevertheless, the CRA agent famous the taxpayer hadn’t reported any earnings or wage since 2013, and no dividends had been paid within the earlier 9 years. The taxpayer was additionally unable to supply particulars of the work he carried out, nor when it was carried out. No invoices or receipts have been obtainable.

The taxpayer challenged the CRA’s denial of his advantages, and went to courtroom searching for a judicial overview of the CRA officer’s choice. In these instances, the federal courtroom decide’s function is to find out whether or not the CRA’s choice to disclaim the taxpayer CERB or CRB was “affordable.”

In courtroom, the taxpayer argued that he met the CERB and CRB standards as a result of he declared greater than $5,000 of dividends, as evidenced by the T5 slip. He additional maintained, citing a 1990 Supreme Court of Canada decision, that dividends “represent a return on an funding and never a return for work or a service {that a} shareholder supplies to an organization.”

However mere receipt of dividend earnings from his company was not ample for both the CRA officer or the decide. “With out proof that the (taxpayer) carried out work and was paid, it was not unreasonable for the (CRA) officer to conclude that he didn’t meet the eligibility standards,” the decide stated. “He failed to supply proof of (i) the work he carried out, (ii) when the work was carried out, and iii) no bill or receipt to assist the work carried out.”

Article content material

In consequence, the decide, regardless of being sympathetic to the taxpayer’s monetary hardship in being requested to repay 1000’s of {dollars} in advantages, concluded the CRA’s choice was affordable and that no reviewable error was made.

The second current case concerned a taxpayer who went to Federal Courtroom searching for a judicial overview of the CRA’s choice to disclaim him CRB for the two-week interval of Jan. 31, 2021, to Feb. 13, 2021, and the two-week durations from Feb. 28, 2021, to Oct. 23, 2021. He was being requested to repay $16,000 in advantages.

The taxpayer’s CRB utility was denied on the idea he had not earned not less than $5,000 of (self-)employment earnings in 2019, 2020, or within the 12 months earlier than the date of his first utility.

The taxpayer maintained the CRA officer’s choice “was unreasonable and needs to be put aside” as a result of the officer didn’t correctly think about invoices from the taxpayer’s  catering enterprise. The CRA officer had famous the invoices “didn’t present prospects names or tackle (sic).” In courtroom, nevertheless, the decide famous the invoices do, certainly, seem to supply the shoppers’ names together with their phone numbers.

Article content material

Whereas the taxpayer wished the decide to right away declare that he met CRB’s eligibility necessities and to annul the $16,000 owing to the CRA, the decide declined to take action as there was nonetheless some uncertainty as as to if the taxpayer met the factors since he didn’t declare any self-employment earnings in his 2019 or 2020 earnings tax returns.

As an alternative, the decide ordered the matter to be reviewed “afresh” by a unique CRA officer who can “correctly think about all the documentation submitted by the (taxpayer) to assist his eligibility for the CRB.”

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].

_____________________________________________________________

When you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

_____________________________________________________________

Article content material