Deep dive into CRA rules around using the tax-free FHSA to buy a home

Article content material

Spring and prime house-hunting season are simply across the nook, so some Canadians might quickly begin a seek for their first residence.

Happily, they will now reap the benefits of the brand new tax-free first home savings account (FHSA) to assist pay for that residence.

Article content material

Because the FHSA’s launch in 2023, the Canada Revenue Agency has answered plenty of widespread questions that potential contributors have been asking. Earlier than sharing a number of of them, let’s shortly recap the FHSA fundamentals.

Article content material

The FHSA is a registered plan that permits potential homebuyers to contribute $8,000 per 12 months, as much as a $40,000 lifetime restrict, to avoid wasting on a tax-free foundation in the direction of the acquisition of a primary residence in Canada. The FHSA gives contributors with a tax deduction for his or her contributions, there’s no tax on the account’s revenue and progress for as much as 15 years, and it permits for the tax-free withdrawal of all contributions, funding revenue and progress earned within the account when used to purchase a primary residence.

To open an FHSA, you have to be a resident of Canada, at the least 18 years of age and a first-time homebuyer, outlined as somebody who doesn’t stay in a house as their principal place of residence that’s owned, collectively or in any other case, by both them or their partner or common-law accomplice within the calendar 12 months through which the account is opened (previous to the house buy) or within the previous 4 calendar years.

The FHSA can stay open for as much as 15 years or till the tip of the 12 months you flip 71. Any funds within the FHSA not used to purchase a qualifying residence by this time will be transferred on a tax-deferred foundation right into a registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP) or registered retirement revenue fund (RRIF), or withdrawn on a taxable foundation.

Article content material

Article content material

This implies opening up an FHSA for qualifying first-time homebuyers is really a no-risk proposition (ignoring any funding danger): if you happen to don’t find yourself shopping for a house, you successfully get one other $40,000 (plus progress) of RRSP room and also you’ve loved as much as a 15-year tax deferral.

One of the crucial widespread questions on opening up an FHSA considerations conditions the place one partner or accomplice already owns a house.

For instance, let’s say Noah, who has by no means owned a house, opened an FHSA in September 2023 and contributed $8,000 that very same month. He put in one other $8,000 in January 2024. In February 2024, Noah married Rachel, and subsequently moved in together with her, dwelling in a rental she has owned as her principal place of residence since 2021 (Noah will not be a co-owner). That very same month, Noah signed a purchase order settlement to collectively purchase a qualifying residence with Rachel. The written buy settlement acknowledged that each Noah and Rachel would be the homeowners of the home, and the possession date shall be Aug. 18, 2024.

Noah and Rachel had been dwelling within the rental that Rachel owned as their principal place of residence on the time they signed the written buy settlement to purchase their new residence. The excellent news is that Noah shall be permitted to withdraw the $16,000 (plus any progress) tax free from his FHSA to assist fund the down cost. That’s as a result of for functions of withdrawing funds from an FHSA, the house possession historical past of 1’s partner or accomplice is irrelevant.

Article content material

One other FHSA state of affairs the CRA just lately commented on concerned a person who bought an revenue property in 2020 and rented it out to numerous tenants to earn revenue. In November 2023, when his most up-to-date tenant determined to not renew his lease, the proprietor determined to alter the house’s use and make it his principal residence. Previous to this, he had by no means lived in the home, having at all times lived together with his mother and father.

He felt he ought to have the ability to withdraw funds from his FHSA when he moved into the house since, below the “change of use” guidelines within the Revenue Tax Act that apply when a principal residence is transformed to a rental property and vice versa, you’re thought of to have bought the property at its truthful market worth and to have instantly reacquired the property for a similar quantity.

The final rule is that upon such a change in use, you’re required to report the ensuing capital achieve within the tax 12 months this variation of use happens (unless you make a special tax election.)

The CRA responded that based mostly on the wording of the Tax Act, the change-of-use guidelines are solely relevant for the needs of calculating a capital achieve (or loss) on the deemed disposition and reacquisition of property, and easily don’t apply to the FHSA regime.

Article content material

Because of this, the taxpayer wouldn’t be eligible to withdraw funds from his FHSA tax free upon shifting into his rental property since he had already “acquired” the house in 2020. The “change in use he manufactured from his home as of November 2023, doesn’t represent an acquisition for the needs of (the FHSA guidelines),” the CRA mentioned.

The CRA was additionally requested about a wide range of eventualities the place a person who has an FHSA wished to make a qualifying tax-free withdrawal to buy a house collectively, with a number of individuals.

For instance, the taxpayer, a first-time homebuyer and two of his mates signed a suggestion to buy a duplex in equal shares. The taxpayer will stay in one of many two flats of the duplex as his principal residence, whereas the opposite unit shall be rented out. The CRA mentioned the taxpayer could be eligible to withdraw funds tax free from his FHSA since “he is a celebration, with a number of different individuals” to an settlement to purchase a house.

The CRA mentioned the reply could be the identical had the taxpayer as a substitute purchased a rental together with his father in equal shares, however solely the taxpayer lived within the rental as his ​principal residence.

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].

For those who appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

Article content material